Regret: Searching For American Dreams in the Mirror-“Natasha”

Regret: Searching For American Dreams in the Mirror-“Natasha”

Henry David Thoreau, Regret Conossieur

“Make it a rule of life never to regret and never to look back. Regret is an appalling waste of energy; you can’t build on it; it’s only for wallowing in.” So said Katherine Mansfield, writer. Henry David Thoreau, ever the devil’s advocate, wrote “Make the most of your regrets; never smother your sorrow, but tend and cherish it till it comes to have a separate and integral interest. To regret deeply is to live afresh.” Both opinions illustrate the part regret has come to play in the minds of the American people. Either it is wallowed in, or disregarded entirely. It doesn’t matter how one deals with their own regret; it invariably returns to haunt them.

A cultural haunting, according to coiner of the term Kathleen Brogan, is a new genre of ghost story, focusing on the haunting of a group and driven by a collective unconscious. No more are the thrilling fireside tales of yore; instead the reader experiences a rediscovering of identity and a hallucinatory haunting of the self. Toni Morrison has written about a concept she calls “rememory”, where an object or person may be gone but lives on in the thoughts and memories of those close to it. No longer is “I think, therefore I am” relevant. Instead, it should be written “I remember, therefore it is.” Such is a cultural haunting.

Regret can be a cultural haunting, particularly in how it pertains to Americans and the much-vaunted “American Dream”. Jacques Lacan, a French psychologist, pioneered a psychoanalytic theory known as the mirror stage. In the mirror stage children,  recognizing themselves for the first time in the mirror, create an idealized version of the self that they will never be able to achieve. And so, automatically, from six months onwards, humans are failures, at least in comparison to their “perfect selves”. This wouldn’t be a problem in many other cultures, where accomplishing all of one’s dreams is not seen as feasible or necessary. But, in America, a nation whose citizens not only desire but expect justice, equality, and social mobility, the mirror stage has created a perfect storm of dissatisfaction. Even in the richest nation in the world, people are unable to achieve all they aspire to, and it’s a difficult pill to swallow. Regret festers.

Richard Russo’s Empire Falls and Edgar Allan Poe’s A Dream Within A Dream are good examples of thwarted Americana, and will be discussed later. Russo paints a subtle portrait of quietly dying dreams in a small town, and the almost imperceptible acceptance of that loss. In Empire Falls, desires are sacrificed upon the altar of reality. Poe, by contrast, writes a histrionic and Gothic portrayal of grief and loss, an existentialist dirge to wanting what can’t be possessed.

Humans, and Americans in particular, are compelled to live up to the unrealistic and idealized self they once glimpsed and loved as infants. Society showcases success stories and shoves the average masses under the carpet, enforcing impractical moral, financial, and emotional obligations. Nostalgia or remorse is shamed. Regret is the inevitable result of all these factors, and it needs to be accepted as a part of life instead of treated like a disease or a personal fault.

Katherine Mansfield, enemy of regret everywhere.

The general public is hopeful about aging. At the TED talks, a panel proclaims that “90 is the new 50.” The question of whether people want 90 to be the new 50 is not brought up. It is simply assumed that, with so much to do and fix, anyone would want to live forever. Having “a sense of purpose” and advanced caloric restriction have been deemed helpful.

Vanity Fair frets that the American Dream might be disappearing. In the depths of the Great Depression, they say, things were better. At least then a man could pull himself up by the bootstraps and make something of himself. Now we are facing, as President Obama has proclaimed, “An American Dream in reverse.” The thought is frightening. Once again America is in dire straits, and for everyone (but particularly the working class), achieving all of one’s hopes and dreams has become increasingly difficult. Some might even call it unrealistic.

Obama is worried about the American Dream.

Lacan, who as previously mentioned created the concept of the mirror stage, elaborated in an admittedly wordy lecture known as “The Mirror Stage as Formative of the Function of the I as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience”. Though the lecture was intended for psychoanalysts and not laypeople, and at places reads as psychobabble for the uninitiated, the basic concept of the mirror stage is intact.

Sometime between six and eighteen months, when a human child is still developmentally immature and less advanced than, say, a chimpanzee, they will stare at a person in the mirror and recognize that person as themselves. This is a massive step in their cognitive development, the recognition of self, because for the first time the baby is aware of being separate from, and different than, the mother. The baby, liberated, begins to develop self-control, thoughts, logic, and, most importantly, an idealized self. That is, they become human.

They will look into their own image (Lacan referred to it as the imago), think of it as perfect, and identify it as themselves. Thus begins a lifelong quest to strive towards this “I”, to literally find oneself. This splitting of self image can lead to such mental conditions as anxiety, neurosis, and psychosis. It can also lead to regret, whether because one never finds themself or because they do and realize that they can never be that baby in the mirror.

Since this essay psychoanalysis has been attempting to find a cure for regret. However, the field has had little to contribute in the way of answers. Regret appears to be deep rooted in the psyche. And the American social system isn’t helping.

Barbara Ehrenreich wrote a groundbreaking book, deep undercover as one of the working poor, called Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America. She found that social mobility was largely a lie, prevented by dead-end jobs, unaffordable education, and check-cashing scams, and that when one was entrenched in the lower class, one tended to stay there. After learning that one of her coworkers was renting out a motel room by the night, she scolded her and said to go get an apartment. The coworker looked at her, and said that she had no money for a down payment. Economic circumstances by necessity can stifle desires and moral virtue, and breed regret

David Brooks, New York Times columnist, wrote a book called The Social Animal. It has an innovative structure, wrapping statistics and studies around the birth, life, and death of a fictional man named Harold. Harold struggles to accept his own, stolidly middle class existence, and the contrast it poses to the romantic aspirations of his youth. His wife, Erica, has an affair and regrets it, not because she betrayed her husband but because she felt as if she wasn’t living up to her self imposed moral code. Erica and Harold spent their lives striving towards their “Ideal I’s”, and were consumed with regret when they relapsed into what they viewed as mediocrity. Sociology shows that regret is unavoidable in the human condition.

Philip Roth, novelist, is a writer. His masterpiece, Pulitzer-prize winning American Pastoral, takes a literary perspective on regret. The main character, Seymore “Swede” Levov, living embodiment of the American dream, feels as if he has avoided regret entirely. His immigrant father and grandfather have built from nothing a successful glove-manufacturing empire, and he inherits it just before marrying the beautiful Miss New Jersey. And yet, regret encroaches, rearing it’s ugly head upon the scene. His only daughter turns radical, blows up a post office, and goes underground. He cheats on his wife. His wife cheats on him. Later on in the book, Roth writes of The Swede that ““Never in his life had [he] occasion to ask himself, “Why are things the way they are?” Why should he bother, when the way they were was always perfect? Why are things the way they are? The question to which there is no answer, and up till then he was so blessed he didn’t even know the question existed.” And regret treads its toiling way through the humanities, manifesting here as the desire to know why.

Theology has few answers. Dag Hammarskjöld, former secretary-general of the UN, dead since 1961 by way of plane crash, and a deeply religious man, posthumously published a book called Markings. Viewed as a classic of spiritual literary discourse, it is absolutely chock-full of regret. An entry shortly before is death reads as a poem: “Summoned/To carry it,/Aloned/To assay it,/Chosen/To suffer it,/And free/To deny it,/I saw/For one moment/The sail/In the sun-storm,/Far off/On a wave-crest,/Alone,/Bearing from land./For one moment/I saw.” Bent by the burden of virtue, he saw for one moment his perfect self, and it slipped away. Mother Theresa’s personal writings are similarly tormented. If two people we can justifiably view as paragons of faith are touched by regret, who isn’t?

Jacques Lacan ponders the nature of existence.

Two texts covered in class have interesting perspectives of regret. One, Empire Falls, Richard Russo’s novel, is suffused with regret, in a mild, long-suffering way. Miles, the mild, long-suffering main character, was in his last semester of college when called home by his dying mother, and now manages a apathetic restaurant. He married a woman who he didn’t love and cheated on him, and is in love with a waitress but too shy to tell her. His wife regrets leaving him. His daughter regrets her lack of friends and hormonal teenaged love life. A boy at her school with regrettably absent parents opens fire and shoots up a sixth period art class, a situation which everyone regrets.

But, at the same time, there’s a deeper level of remorse, beyond the mere plot of the story. Regret has seeped into the bones of the town itself. There is a pervasive sense of contentment rather than ecstasy, of being satisfied rather than fulfilled. Love is a fairy tale, and if one attempts to “search for themselves”, they better find whatever they’re looking for quick, settle down, and grow up. Each parent wants better for their child, and every child follows the footsteps of the parent. There is a haunted feel about Empire Falls. Once could even call it a cultural haunting. The town is filled with the ghosts of expectations, spilling over with dead dreams.

A Dream Within A Dream shows a very different sort of cultural haunting. The narrator is mourning the ghost of his lost love one, and regretting his lost love. Though he knew that his relationship could never last, he embarked upon it anyways. That is, for him, regret was inevitable in order to experience love.

In the second stanza, his point expands to include life itself and the meaning of his existence. Life doesn’t matter, he writes, it is “But a dream within a dream”, and yet, he clings to it anyway. For the narrator, death and regret go hand in hand, and he accepts it, even revels in it. Regret is a necessary evil in order to fully experience life.

Richard Russo’s Empire Falls.

Regret, be it marital, martial, or mortal, is an essential and unavoidable part of living. Humans are programmed from infancy onwards to view regret as shameful, as a symptom of failure when one is unable to become the “Ideal-I” and live up to impossible expectations. Culture, American culture in particular, advances this stigmatization of regret by creating an artificial social construct that encourages unrealistic expectations and punishes those that cannot achieve them. Entitlement to success and fulfillment in combination with the Lacanian “I” and tempered by reality leads to regret.

Some might think that the solution is to discourage aspirations and hopes of social equality, or to attempt to re-engineer or psychoanalyze the mind. This is an absolutely wrongheaded answer. Instead of attempting to banish or explain away regret, it should be accepted as the result of a life well lived, instead of shunned as a social taboo. Healthy regret should be welcomed. One will always fail to meet some expectations, whether they are imposed by themselves or others, and regret in these situations should be affirmed as a normal response and dealt with before moving on. Though one may never live up to that image of perfection glimpsed once as a child, they can still strive to become the best and happiest person they know how to be, complete with a full spectrum of emotions, regret included. Upon this perhaps Thoreau and Mansfield could agree.

Works Cited

Brooks, David. The Social Animal. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Print. 
Eihrenrich, Barbara. Nickled and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America. N.p.: Metropolitan Books, 
     2001. Print. 
Hammarskjöld, Dag. Markings. N.p.: n.p., 1963. Print. 
Kamp, David. "Rethinking The American Dream." Vanity Fair. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 July 2012. 
     <http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2009/04/american-dream200904>. 
Lacan, Jacques. "The Mirror Stage as Formative of the Function of the I as Revealed in 
     Psychoanalytic Experience." Paris. Lecture. 
Poe, Edgar Allan. A Dream Within A Dream. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Print. 
Roth, Philip. American Pastoral. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Print. 
Russp, Richard. Empire Falls. N.p.: Vintage Contemporaries, n.d. Print. 
Trost, Matthew. "WSF report: 90 Is the New 50." TED Blog. TED, 2 June 2008. Web. 26 July 2012. 
     <http://blog.ted.com/2008/06/02/wsf_report_90_i/>.

Insanity: What is it? What do we think about it? And why do we fear it? Athena

The cultural haunting of insanity can send a shiver down someone’s spine by just the mention of its name. A cultural haunting is a fear that is implanted in the minds of every person in some large group; for example, a religion, a city, a country, or a race. It doesn’t necessarily have to be a visible fear, i.e. a monster running down the street causing terror, it can be the fear of death, or abandonment, or insanity. People don’t like to think about insanity, or the people who are insane. Why? Maybe it is because they treat insanity like a tulpa, which is something that, if thought about too much, becomes a reality. Maybe it’s because the horrible feeling that settles in the pit of the stomach once people realize that there is no way to save the insane is too much to bear. Maybe it is fear of the unknown: what is it like to be insane? What makes people like that? Is there a possibility that insanity could become a personal problem? Whatever the reason, Insanity is a cultural haunting that everyone in America, maybe even the entire world, fears.

Some examples of text with insanity as a topic are The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman and The Tell Tale Heart, The Black Cat, and The Raven by Edgar Allen Poe. So, what causes people to fear insanity so much? How do regular people define and view insanity? How do scholars define and view insanity? How does the author of this blog define and view insanity? And, finally, why does it matter in the first place?

If a person were to look up insanity online, they would find a bunch of ads for a fitness program, a Wikipedia page that is most likely run by a bunch of 22-year-old men sitting on the couch in their mother’s house, and a dictionary site saying that the definition of insanity is “doing something over and over again and expecting a different outcome.” Then, if the person decides to search images of insanity, they will find pictures of people blood covered and screaming, jumping of cliffs, or pictures of people in straight jackets. Basically, the world views insanity in two ways: way on is any person who may have a mental illness, and way two is a screaming banshee. People with mental illnesses are often considered insane, no matter what they have. It has calmed down some in present day where “the wandering womb” is no longer causing hysteria to send woman over the edge, but people still often think “Ok, this person has schizophrenia, they must be insane.” Or “Ok, this person is bipolar, so they must be insane.” The truth is people today are treating insanity like the Victorians treated hysteria: it is the name for all mental illness and problems that come with them. But the view of an everyday person walking down the street is a little different from the view of a scholar.

This is a typical image of what pops into people’s heads when they think the word insanity: a guy screaming like a banshee.

“Unfortunately, [news stories about psychopathic murderers] gives the public the highly subjective impression that “crazy people rant, rave, murder and rape. In reality, (or objectively speaking), mentally ill people are typically not dangerous or assaultive. They usually lead miserable lives (often in secret), have such uncontrollable feelings as worthlessness or anxiety, often cannot handle a job, and are faced with personal and social difficulties that seriously affect them, their family and their friends” (Gallagher 3) The mentally ill, as stated above, are often stereotyped as being insane people out to kill, but scholars tend to think differently. There is not a lot of information agreed upon about mental illness and insanity by scholars, but the one thing they all agree on is that being mentally ill doesn’t automatically make a person a killer. Yes, once a person becomes harmful to themselves and/or others, they are sent to a mental institution so that they can be treated and watched, but that doesn’t mean every single person with a mental illness is going to be harmful. After that point, however, nothing can be agreed upon about mental illnesses and insanity. For example, Robert Sapolsky, a neuroendocrinologist at Stanford University in California, believes that broad definitions of mental illness are beneficial while Erica E. Goode, a reporter for U.S. News & World Report, believes that broad definitions of mental illness may be harmful. (Sapolsky 17, Goode 24) The opposing views of mental illnesses and insanity, like many other things in the science world, make it difficult to pinpoint what all scholars believe about mental illness and insanity other than that it doesn’t always mean the person is dangerous. Sadly, until someone magically invents a peacemaking machine, scholars and their opinions are left to fight it out.

The author’s point of view on mental illness, after doing extensive research, is similar to the view of a scholar. As mentioned early, the author’s opinion is that insanity is used as an umbrella to cover every single mental illness ever diagnosed. The belief that all mentally ill people are insane seems a little screwy. Truthfully, in the author’s opinion, the term insanity only covers the group of people who are so caught between reality and another world, a.k.a liminal, that there is no way to help them other than to let them live as happy lives as possible. But, since scholars and everyday people both disagree with this statement, finding anything reputable distinguishing the difference between the two was impossible. Therefore, all mentions of mental illness and insanity in past paragraphs are to be read as though the two words are synonyms of each other. The author also believes that the insane are really just misunderstood. They don’t know what is right and what is wrong, so doing something wrong may not seem wrong to them and doing something right may not seem right. It all depends on what the individual insane person views as right and wrong.

So, where are examples of insanity in literature? If someone were to read The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, the person would be able to see the slow descent from postpartum depression to insanity that the main character, a nameless female of the Victorian era, goes through after being isolated in a room for over a month. The woman goes from wanting out of the room and claiming that she needs to see her child to obsessing over the fact that she sees a woman trapped behind the wallpaper of the room; eventually, the woman goes so insane that she walks circles around the room trying to trap the woman while her husband is passed out on the floor. The influence for this short story comes from Charlotte’s own life. During the Victorian Era, if anything – headaches, stomach cramps, fainting, or death – happened to a female, they were diagnosed with hysteria. Hysteria, like insanity, was a cover up for all things that happened to women. One treatment for hysteria was bed rest, where the woman would lie in bed, unable to do absolutely anything until they got better. This is the treatment used for both the lady in The Yellow Wallpaper and the author of the story. Charlotte was put on bed rest for 3 months and almost went insane before finally ignoring the treatment and going back to work. She wrote The Yellow Wallpaper to show what probably happened to numerous women who were diagnosed with hysteria and put on bed rest.  Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s short story The Yellow Wallpaper is one great example of insanity, but an even better one is Edgar Allen Poe’s works.

The Raven, the Tell Tale Heart, and the Black Cat are all works by the great Edgar Allen Poe whose dark and depressing life inspired him to write dark and depressing works that are illusive, scary, and definitely insane. The Raven, for example, is about a man who is so depressed by the death of his love Lenore that he begins to talk to a Raven that has flown into his house. In The Black Cat, a man suffering from alcohol abuse kills his cat, an all-black kitten that was the man’s best friend for years. He then stumbles upon another cat that looks exactly like the first, except this one has a white spot on his tummy which, as the old man’s feelings for the cat become increasingly negative, morphs into the shape of a gallows sending the man into a rage that kills his wife and gets her body stuffed into a wall. Finally, in The Tell Tale Heart, a young man kills his landowner because of the landowner’s disturbing eye and then begins to hear the landowner’s heart beating in the floorboards where the body is hidden. Sound insane?  Listen to Poe’s life story.

Poe, whose life resembled that of a tragic opera with the death of everyone he ever loved and the hatred received by his foster-father, tended to write a lot of dark stories and poems. Though Poe was not necessarily insane,he did have alcohol abuse problems and probably also suffered from some serious depression.  His work tended to have at least one person dead or killed at some point in the story, and this may be because everyone Poe loved died. Also, Poe was writing in the dark romanticism genre, meaning a dark and tragic love story, so his works tended to mention love at least once. The insanity in the works of Poe don’t stop at these three stories/poems, he has many other works that are just as chilling, thrilling, and insane.

This is a picture of the great Edgar Allen Poe

So, why are people so afraid of insanity and the people who are insane? It may be because, like Gallagher said, the mentally ill have a really bad reputation of being violent and killing people. It could also possibly be the fact that people hate being different. People want to fit in, they want to be as normal as possible, and insanity is as far from normal as a person can be. Finally, insanity and the insane might be feared because, unless a person is insane, people are clueless about insanity. It is the unknown, and the unknown is greatly feared. People like to know what they’re up against, and with insanity that is nearly impossible. Sure, the brain can be researched and theories can be made about why a person thinks the way they think, but every scholar admits that the brain is constantly changing and there is no true explanation to why certain people go insane.

So, why does it matter? What can the world get out of knowing the different perspectives of insanity? Well, for one thing, if people learn what insanity is by reading about people who are insane or people who study the insane, insanity will become less unknown and, therefore, less frightening. The more people learn about the perspective of an insane person or the perspective of a person who has to live with or loves or even studies an insane person, the easier it will be to find the problem, the reason these people are so lost in another reality, and fix it. If one person is trying to find a needle in a haystack, it could take years; but, if one million people are trying to find a needle in a haystack, it could take a couple of minutes. People who are insane usually aren’t bad or violent; they just see things through a different lens, and the more people who learn that, the easier it will be to accept the fact that a person has a mental illness. So, maybe insanity is a little bit unknown, and maybe the insane are  a little different, but if people read blogs or essays or books or scholarly papers about the insane, the cultural fear of insanity might not seem so big and scary.

-Athena

Works Cited:

Gallagher, Bernard J. “Mental Illness and Society.” The Sociology of Mental Illness. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1995. 3. Print.

Sapolsky/Goode. “The Definitions of Mental Illnesses Should Be Broad/the Definition of Mental Illnesses Should Not Be Broad.” Mental Illness : Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. William Barbour. San Diego: Greenhaven, 1995. 17+. Print. Opposing Viewpoints Ser.

Gilman, Charlotte P. “Gilman, The Yellow Wallpaper.” Gilman, The Yellow Wallpaper. Small and Maynard, 1899. Web. 26 July 2012. <http://www.library.csi.cuny.edu/dept/history/lavender/wallpaper.html&gt;.

Poe, Edgar Allan. Best of Poe: The Tell-tale Heart, the Raven, the Cask of Amontillado, and 30 Others. Clayton, DE: Prestwick House, 2006. Print.

“Poe’s Life.” Edgar Allan Poe Museum : Poe’s Life, Legacy, and Works : Richmond, Virginia. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 July 2012. <http://www.poemuseum.org/life.php&gt;.

Insanity. N.d. Photograph. Domine, Da Mihi Hanc Aquam! Fr. Philip Neri Powell, OP, PhD, 17 Jan. 2009. Web. 26 July 2012. <http://hancaquam.blogspot.com/2009/01/insanity-me-italian-customs.html&gt;.

Apocalypse Americana: How cultural decay and dread of oblivion cause a focus on the apocalypse


“But David’s not gonna die, right?” Lily is part of a group of three children being reviewed and unknowingly taped by their teacher, after a conversation about death was overheard during their regular lunchtime.

“No-mm,” David, clearly perturbed, shakes his head emphatically.

“Of course he will,” Robert interjects.

“No, we won’t”

“Yes, you can die.”

“I won’t die!”

“Yes, you will.”

Strangely, this conversation happening between three obviously small children fairly effectively sums up the human condition when confronted with the fact of our own mortality. Throughout history, humanity has had a strange, morbid fascination with death, as well as an intense fear of the oblivion that follows. Now more than ever, faced with a culture intent on immortalizing the impermanent yet oblivious to its own gradual decay, society has turned towards a fascination with that which is greater, deadlier, more broadly powerful than anything done by man:  the apocalypse.

A cultural haunting, be it aversion to loss, a stigma on gender, or any other haunting from an endless number of possibilities, can be categorized fairly reliably. Jung, though he did not use the term cultural haunting, referred to them in a sidelong manner when he developed his theory of the collective unconscious.  A cultural haunting can be a racial memory, societal prejudice, or an ingrained yet irrational societal instinct.

One of the many hauntings that has only made itself present in the modern era (at least the early 20th century) is the focus we’ve placed on the apocalypse, and more recently, on a world devoid of one. Starting around the same time as War of the Worlds, we as a species were gripped with an interest in a great disaster, be it floods of fire or aliens, which transcended human power and destroyed us all. In later fiction, e.g. Harrison Bergeron, nineteen Eighty-Four, and even Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?,  authors began to investigate the idea of a future missing it’s grand finale, one where civilization decayed to the point of dystopia. However, some time in the mid-1990’s we began to experience a return to the fantastical, awe-inspiring destruction that once graced the pages of new (at the time) books. Possibly, the reason for this return is to escape from the impermanence of a gradual fade into obscurity, a slow breakdown of society; to instead envision ending in a fiery, lasting blaze of glory that will never be forgotten.

 

The cultural fear of impermanence manifests itself through our music, through movies, and through literature such as Empire Falls, the 2001 Pulitzer prize-winning novel written by Richard Russo, which deftly addresses such fears in the small town (Empire Falls, the namesake of the novel itself) that Miles Roby, his ex wife, and his daughter, Tick, live in. The entirety of Empire Falls is a town filled with broken people, mere shells of what they could have been. They are continually haunted by their past, and by the shadow of the dreams they once had; dreams to grow up and make something of themselves, to leave a mark. In essence, to live the American Dream. Their failure to do so is apparent in the book, and that element of the story is starkly realistic.

In Dream Within a Dream by Edgar Alan Poe as well, the main character faces oblivion. In the first stanza, the mood is one of parting temporarily, yet by the time that thee poem finishes he is desperately mourning the permanence of his loss.

I hope that in exploring these two texts, I can show that as a species humans fear not just mortality but the inevitability of a fade from common memory into obscurity. This fear has been made more imminent by the decay of American culture and the American Dream. Due to these two cultural hauntings, we have reverted to apocalyptic themes in media as a way to accept a perceived failure of civilization.

In the novel Empire Falls, even the title itself is subject to interpretation, and the context in which it is put drastically changes the implications of the book. Either it is just the name of a small boomtown under economic depression, or it is a reference to not just the town, but also the decaying state of American culture, economy, and general society. Written in the present tense, it could be referencing the fall of a once great empire.

The imagery implying the fall of an empire as a greater message in the book is clear, particularly in the opening chapters of the book. The following passage makes it evident that the town was once great, but is now mainly abandoned buildings being lived in by few, and haunted by memories:

“…their natural preference was to gaze down to where the street both literally and figuratively dead-ended at the mill and factory, the undeniable physical embodiment of the town’s past, and it was the magnetic quality of the old, abandoned structures that steeled Miles’s resolve to sell the Empire Grill for what little it would bring, just as soon as the restaurant was his.”

In this passage, the town is depicted as something once held up as the standard for what America should be. With time, though, the vision slipped away, and the town itself succumbed to its fall, in much the same way as the narrator in A Dream Within A Dream. Segue!

Edgar Allan Poe, too, is suspect to existential crises over the loss of memory to time. His poem A Dream Within A Dream is particularly telling in its panic over the permanence of mortality in relation to the transitory nature of humanity. In the lines And I hold within my hand/ Grains of the golden sand-/ How few! Yet how they creep/ Through my fingers to the deep, / While I weep- while I weep! / O God! Can I not grasp/ Them with a tighter clasp? / O God! Can I not save/ One from the pitiless wave?, Poe mourns the way he cannot hold on to sand, in this case perhaps a metaphor for time, and the inevitability of the material being lost to a greater, unstoppable force. This can possibly hint at a basic human instinct to revert to an acceptance of inevitability instead of facing what you personally could have done differently: Poe’s attributing the slipping of sand to the wave and humans’ attribution of the end of society to the apocalypse both point at a desire to avoid responsibility and to defer to a higher power.

Scholars, too, have written plentifully on the subject of humans’ need to find higher power, though mostly this effort has been focused on religion. They have, though, written extensively on the subject of death, denial, and acceptance of mortality, notably Akhtar Salman, author of The Wound of Mortality: Fear, Denial, and Acceptance of Death. In his book, he speaks of how from an early age humans begin to grasp the idea of death, and later accept it as natural and inevitable. However, we remain haunted as a culture by the idea that with us dies our ideas and pasts, so that mortality is equal to oblivion, at least in the material world. Particularly in this era, which Peter D. McClelland and Peter H. Tobin (authors of American Dream Dying: The Changing Economic Lot of the Least Advantaged) say marks the fall of the American Dream for the lower class and small town America, our value is judged by what we leave behind after death. In Empire Falls, the epitome of the aforementioned lower class town, the remaining residents have accepted the their slip into obscurity and the insignificance they are faced with when presented with their eventual deaths. Another very notable contributor to the subject of both the modern age and the apocalypse is Robert Glenn Howard, author of Network Apocalypse: Visions of the End in an Age of Internet Media. He speaks of how in the age of the Internet, views of the apocalypse have not only been brought to the forefront, but also changed slightly to accommodate the digital age.

Of course, a return to such apocalyptic scenarios would not have gone unnoticed by those motivating it; namely, the general public. The Internet has always had a fascination with the morbid and macabre, and this push towards Armageddon has been heavily championed online, with 148 sources cited on the Wikipedia page ‘The 2012 Phenomenon’. According to NASA, “Dec. 21, 2012, won’t be the end of the world as we know. It will, however, be another winter solstice,” a belief cited by many on the topic of the upcoming 2012 ‘Mayan apocalypse’. Other sources, such as Fox News, enjoy speculating on causes of the apocalypse, as seen in the article It’s the End of the World: 8 Potential Armageddons. Although the return to the apocalypse, also seen in movies such as Cloverfield, 2012, I Am Legend, and Zombieland, could just be sparked by the Mayan calendar, from a psychological standpoint humanity has always been predisposed to find higher power where our design has failed; it is entirely possible that our recent resurgence of Armageddon in pop culture is linked to our dread of seeing Americana decline in a gradual, nearly inevitable collapse.

 

As a nation, and as a world unified by the Internet, we fear the decay of our society. We fear for the decay of our bodies and of our legacies while simultaneously searching for a greater power to end it all before we destroy ourselves. American culture has been haunted ceaselessly by the threat of our own transience on Earth. The idea of a life resigned to mediocrity, followed by a fade into oblivion until even your name is just a scratch on a weathered tombstone, is abhorred by many and sometimes viewed as the ultimate defeat. To be lost from this world is an idea incomprehensible to brains that are instinctively driven to endure, and for this reason we remain a culture haunted by oblivion.

“I’m 67 years old. Every day, the future looks a little bit darker. But the past… even the grimy parts of it… keep on getting brighter.”

Sally Jupiter, The Watchmen

 

 

Works Cited

 

Akhtar, Salman. The Wound of Mortality: Fear, Denial, and Acceptance of Death. Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson, 2010. Print.

Brandon, John. “It’s the End of the World: 8 Potential Armageddons.” Fox News. FOX News Network, 29 Sept. 2010. Web. 25 July 2012. <http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/09/29/end-of-the-world-potential-armageddon/&gt;.

Howard, Robert Glenn. Network Apocalypse: Visions of the End in an Age of Internet Media. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2011. Print.

McClelland, Peter D., and Peter H. Tobin. American Dream Dying: The Changing Economic Lot of the Least Advantaged. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010. Print.

Piven, Jerry S., ed. The Psychology of Death in Fantasy and History. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2004. Print.

Russo, Richard. Empire Falls. New York: Vintage, 2002. Print.

“Y2K and the Apocalypse.” Y2K and the Apocalypse. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 July 2012. <http://www.adl.org/y2k/apocalypse.asp&gt;.

 

Freyja

Thom, Meet Drake: Musical Men and the Ghosts That Love Them-Natasha

At first, it seems difficult to find any similarities between Drake, Canadian hip-hop artist, and Radiohead, British Alt-Rock band. One raps, the other warbles. Where one employs pounding base, the other uses acoustic guitar. But a sort of creepiness, a pessimism and Gothic sensibility, a paranoia, draws them together.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwyjxsOYnys

Drake’s Song, Marvin’s Room

The song Marvin’s Room, from Drake’s second album, Take Care, begins with an anonymous woman leaving a voicemail message, a literal ghost in a track full of figurative ones. Throughout the song, even as he sings hooks and raps verses, Drake’s voice floats in and out of the music, muffled and full of static, as if coming out of a cheap cell phone. He is haunted by a woman that has moved on and is “happy with a good guy”, and by his own womanizing, hard partying lifestyle. Near the end, he sings,

Talk to me please, don’t have much to believe in

I need you right now, are you down to listen to me?

Too many drinks have been given to me

I got some women that’s living off me

Paid for their flights and hotels, I’m ashamed

In his homage to Marvin Gaye he shows some of what led him astray. Marvin’s room is a parable of vulnerability, and self-doubt. Even as he insults the woman who has left him and is happy, he confesses his own unhappiness, his desire for her and a better life. He is ashamed of what he has become without her in his life. In short, he is haunted, by his ex and his own regret. A little earlier, he raps:

I think I’m addicted to naked pictures

And sittin talkin’ ’bout bitches

that we almost had

I don’t think I’m concious of making monsters

Outta the women I sponsor til it all goes bad

But shit it’s all good

Drake has to rap the last line, or lose the armor that he has been wearing throughout his hip hop career. If he admits that he legitimately is upset with his life of loose money and sex, he has to admit it to himself, and even in Marvin’s Room he cannot do this. To do so would be to state that, despite his superstar status, he is a failure, both to himself and the woman he is pining for. Her ghost, and the ghost of his pride, hover over the song.

Aubrey Drake Graham, “Drake”

In contrast, there is Radiohead. No Surprises sounds at first, if one is not listening to the lyrics, like some sort of lullaby; the glockenspiel that keeps the beat is soothing and unexpectedly sweet. It’s a shock, then, to discover that the song is really about suicide, and that the listener is being lulled to sleep just as the singer is entering his own, deeper rest. The song begins by listing the problems in the protagonists life.

A heart that’s full up like a landfill

A job that slowly kills you

Bruises that won’t heal

In short, people are treating his emotions like trash, he’s stuck in a soulless, dehumanizing line of work, and all of his pains and troubles are accumulating and will never be resolved. The song continues,

You look so tired unhappy

Bring down the government

They don’t, they don’t speak for us

I’ll take a quiet life

A handshake of carbon monoxide

And no alarms and no surprises

No alarms and no surprises

No alarms and no surprises

Silent, silent

So the song expands, until it’s not just people, not just his job, but the entire world that is against the writer. He (she) feels voiceless, drowned out in a totalitarian state and a sea of voices. He decides he prefers the ultimate peace and quiet of death to clamorous unhappiness, and so he decides to gas himself and die, going to a place where there are “no alarms, and no surprises”. The chorus repeats itself as the writer is committing suicide, and ends as he moves on.

Such a pretty houses
And such a pretty garden
No alarms and no surprises
No alarms and no surprises
No alarms and no surprises please 

The ending is open to interpretation. Either he has, in fact, passed on, and is now in some sort of afterlife, some pastoral scene where a house and a garden are waiting for him. The sun is shining upon him, children are playing, and finally he is welcomed and understood, able to enjoy his peace and quiet in a better place.
Maybe this is how No Surprises ends?
Alternatively, the house and garden that Yorke envisioned could just be the hallucinatory products of a fever dream, the last creation of frantic synapses before the cord was pulled and there were no more surprises for the narrator in the song. This is a more depressing vision of death, and in that sense fits better with the Radiohead canon. At the end of the song, Yorke has himself become a ghost, haunting the world that he wanted no part of. Just as the juxtaposition of the twee instrumentation and the incredibly morbid lyrics lend a bizarre pathos to the song, Yorke’s strangely happy ending seems out of place and yet fitting. It leaves one haunted by the hope that maybe the writer did escape thus world, after all, and the more prevalent, sinking assurance that he did not.
Radiohead- No Surprises
British Alt-Rock Band Radiohead

Haunted Lyrics: Hurt and Matches to Paper Dolls

Dessa, a female rapper-songwriter from the indie collective Doomtree, and Johnny Cash, a late legend in country and southern rock, may be worlds apart in the feel of their music, yet both have a surprising amount in common in terms of the undertones of some of their songs.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Dessa – Matches to Paper Dolls

Now we’re lost
Between love and cholera
Saccharine read, such a sentimental novel
Give you cavities if it doesn’t drive you to the bottle
As for me, I’ll take another kerosene if you got it
Something harder, look, like a moth you see
And I still get chills when you talk to me
But the years pass by now in twos and threes
These thrills ain’t as cheap as they used to be

Full lyrics: http://www.songmeanings.net/songs/view/3530822107858821022/

View the song here.

In Matches to Paper Dolls, Dessa is haunted by her past relationship, and her failure to distance herself from the aftermath. In the above lines, as well as throughout the rest of the song, lines she recognizes the cycle she’s in, and her inability to break free.  In the song, Dessa compares her return to that which harms her as a moth’s attraction to a flame: although providing temporary warmth, the flame will inevitably destroy that which is drawn to it. Yet still she returns to this shattered, almost sickening pattern, it being dangerous yet still safer than being alone and facing the uncertainty that follows. This speaks of a greater cultural inability to distance ourselves from broken pasts, possibly because of the innate fear of loneliness or the unknown that comes with finally breaking off of a destructive, but familiar, cycle. Other lines in the song, particularly I changed the locks/ But your key, your key’s still working, also speak of a cultural insecurity, and a fear of breach in security. The person Dessa references can get past all of her defenses, leaving her vulnerable in a way that, frankly, terrifies most people, particularly in this culture of impenetrable facades.

Johnny Cash – Hurt

Beneath the stains of time
The feelings disappear
You are someone else
I am still right here

What have I become
My sweetest friend
Everyone I know
goes away
In the end
And you could have it all
My empire of dirt
I will let you down
I will make you hurt

Full lyrics http://www.elyrics.net/read/j/johnny-cash-lyrics/hurt-lyrics.html

The music video’s linked here.

In Hurt, a song originally penned by Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails and covered by the late Johnny Cash near the end of his life, Cash sings of his past, and the regrets he felt burdened with. In particular he alludes to his feelings of loss in the lines Everyone I know/ Goes away/ In the end, and the way he feels he’s failed those near to him due to his long history of alcoholism and drug abuse, as well as several cases of spousal abuse. In his song, one feels privy to all the raw emotion of a man late in life, looking back and feeling a deep-set fear of failure, of the irreversibility of his mistakes. The lyrics And you can have it all/ My empire of dirt cast light on the fear that no matter how far one comes, and how successful one appears to be, in the end we are all reduced to the same material nothingness under the inevitability of our mortality. These fear, though certainly present in the song, end up coming back to greater cultural tides: especially in this culture so eager to immortalize those in the age of the internet, one of our greatest fears is of being not just forgotten, but reduced to nothing. The innate dread tied to lacking anything, to being reduced to absolutely nothing, has haunted humanity for most of time, and has never been so present as in the Age of Technology.

Overall, though different, these two songs both resonate with the feeling of being haunted by a broken past, a widespread feeling shared by many the world over. Also, both songs mourn in a way the inevitable hopelessness of the singer’s future, and their lack of power to change it. This feeling of powerlessness in the face of impending hurt or destruction is not only haunting to us in itself, but is currently manifesting itself partly in the dread of the apocalypse, something that feels unstoppably powerful and wholly terrifying.

– Freyja

Haunted Songs: The Cave by Mumford and Sons and Samson by Regina Spektor – By Athena

Ever heard of Regina Spektor? What about Mumford and Sons? If you have heard of either of these two musical legends, then your probably wondering why I am writing about them on a page about haunted things. You see, I was told today that I needed to pick to songs and figure out what the singers were haunted by. Example:Taylor Swift is haunted by her many many many past relationships. So wha did my detective work reveal about the hauntings in The Cave and Samson? Way to much to put in one paragraph that’s for sure! I will also be comparing and contrasting my two artists and songs.

Truthfully, before today I had never even heard of Regina Spektor, much less listened to her music. Thankfully, a friend of mine recommended the song Samson to me and I was able to get a pretty good grasp on Regina’s life and music through research. I found out that Regina Spektor is originally from Moscow, The Soviet Union. She learned to play piano on a Petrof upright that her mother received from her grandfather. She was born into a musically gifted family: her mom was a music professor and her father is an ammeter violinist, and she emigrated from Russia with her parents and her brother, Bear, in 1989 due to religious reasons. Sadly, she had to leave her piano behind, but once in America Regina practiced on hard table tops, furniture, and a piano in the basement of her synagogue. While attending camp in her teenage years, Regina realized that she was really good at writing songs as well as playing them, and so her stardom began. Now, she is happily married to Jack Dishel. The song I chose, Samson, to me shows the narrator and maybe even the narrator’s love being haunted by both the disease that they had – cancer –  and the knowledge that they were probably going to die. Also, i think the singer may be haunted by the fear that she didn’t get to make a mark on the world before leaving it. The words go

You are my sweetest downfall
I loved you first, I loved you first
Beneath the sheets of paper lies my truth
I have to go, I have to go
Your hair was long when we first met

This is the opening stanza in which the singer is talking to her lover about how she loved him first, but she has to go. I interpreted this as she was going to die, and she wanted him to know she loved him.
Samson went back to bed
Not much hair left on his head
He ate a slice of wonder bread and went right back to bed
And history books forgot about us and the bible didn’t mention us
And the bible didn’t mention us, not even once

This is the point where I began to think that maybe Samson has cancer to because of his lack of energy and hair. Also, this is the point where the singer reveals the fear that they didn’t map their mark on the world.

You are my sweetest downfall
I loved you first, I loved you first
Beneath the stars came fallin’ on our heads
But they’re just old light, they’re just old light
Your hair was long when we first met
This is the part where the singer is, once again, telling Samson how much she loved him, but also that it’s time for her to go. I think this means she will die soon.
Samson came to my bed
Told me that my hair was red
Told me I was beautiful and came into my bed
Oh I cut his hair myself one night
A pair of dull scissors in the yellow light
And he told me that I’d done alright
And kissed me ’til the mornin’ light, the mornin’ light
And he kissed me ’til the mornin’ light

This solidifies my theory that they both have cancer because Samson tells the narrator that her hair was red, as in saying that it isn’t their anymore. The part where the narrator talks about cutting Samson’s hair can refer to the fact that when cancer patients go through chemo, they often shave their head before it all falls out.  This song has very sad lyrics that help add to the depressing mood and the tune of the song is kind of calming, like the narrator is trying to accept the inevitable.

This is the official music video of Samson by Regina Spektor.

This is a Petrof Upright, like the piano Regina Spektor first learned to play on

This is a picture of a Petrof Upright Piano, regina Spektor’s piano may have looked something like this.

Mumford and Sons are a band that not only have I heard of before, but that my dad and I both listen to obsessively. So, I had a little more knowledge on these guys going into this , but not by much. I knew already that Mumford and Sons was a British folk rock band, and that they played quiet a few instruments. What i didn’t know, however, was that they could play the keyboard, the guitar, the drums, the bass guitar, the banjo, the mandolin, and the resonator guitar. I also didn’t know that the reason they are called Mumford and Sons is that Mumford, one of the members of the band, was most visible when they performed so his name got put in the title of the band. The and Sons part is meant to evoke a sense that the band is family. The song I chose, The Cave, shows that the narrator is haunted by something that isn’t even his fault. From what I interpreted from the song, the narrator is talking about someone who did something bad and now won’t own up to it, so the narrator has to help them. The words go:

It’s empty in the valley of your heart
The sun, it rises slowly as you walk
Away from all the fears
And all the faults you’ve left behind
this is where we are introduced to both narrator and the person he is talking to. It could be a friend or a lover, but whoever they are, it is clear that the narrator thinks they are not only slightly evil, but also running away from their problems.The harvest left no food for you to eat
You cannibal, you meat-eater, you see
But I have seen the same
I know the shame in your defeat
This is more acknowledgement from the narrator that the person did something wrong and the narrator discovered
But I will hold on hope
And I won’t let you choke
On the noose around your neck
This is where I feel like the narrator is saying “fine, i will help you!”
And I’ll find strength in pain
And I will change my ways
I’ll know my name as it’s called again
At this point, I think the narrator is trying to show that heunlike the other person, will accept the consequences of their actions and try to become better.  The tune to this song is slightly haunting in and of itself, the intro is just a guitar (I think) playing a tune. Soon enough, a male voice comes in and begins to sing. Actually, most of the song is just the male singer and and the guitar; the only time more instruments are added is when the narrator is finally saying “You know what, I am done trying to fix your problems!” This is another haunting I found in this sound: the narrator’s haunted by failure and the fact that he really can’t help the person he is singing to. So, he has to leave.
          This is the music video for Mumford and Sons The Cave. 

This is the boys of Mumford and Sons

So what does Regina Spektor and her song Samson have in common with Mumford and Sons with its song The Cave?  Well, for one thing, they are both not originally from America. In Fact, Mumford and Sons still doesn’t live in America. They are over in Europe rocking out. Regina Spektor, however, did emigrate to America and join the lovely great american melting pot. Also, both bands make use of at least one percussion instrument: Regina with her piano and Mumford and Sons with their drums and keyboard. The songs I chose both show hauntings pertaining to other people. One of the hauntings reveled in Samson is that the person is haunted by the idea that they are going to have to leave a loved one. In The Cave, that same kind of haunting appears at the end. The last thing that both these songs and singers have in common is that they are really really good and you should all go listen to them.
Thanks and Chao!
 Athena
Work Cited :
“Mumford and Sons.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 19 July 2012. Web. 24 July 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mumford_and_Sons&gt;.
“Regina Spektor.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 21 July 2012. Web. 24 July 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regina_Spektor&gt;.
Mumford & Sons – The Cave. Dir. Islandrecords. Perf. Ben Lovett, Country Winston, Ted Dwayne, Marcus Mumford. YouTube. YouTube, 28 Jan. 2010. Web. 24 July 2012. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KkUeRPjc-Y&gt;.
Regina Spektor – Samson [OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO]. Perf. Regina Spektor. YouTube. YouTube, 13 Nov. 2006. Web. 24 July 2012. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p62rfWxs6a8&gt;.
“Http://reginaspektor.com/.” Http://reginaspektor.com/. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 July 2012. <http://reginaspektor.com/&gt;.
“Mumford & Sons.” Mumford & Sons. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 July 2012. <http://www.mumfordandsons.com/&gt;.
“Taylor Swift.” Taylor Swift. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 July 2012. <http://taylorswift.com/&gt;.
Upright Piano P 125 F1. N.d. Photograph. Hradec Králové, CZECH REPUBLIC.Petrof Pianos. Web. 24 July 2012. <http://www.petrof.com/upright-piano-petrof-p-125-f1.html&gt;.

Turn of The Screw – A Literary Psychoanalysis

The Turn of the Screw is a stunningly enigmatic novel, and it and its author alike are capable of being analyzed and critiqued in too many ways to count.  One particularly popular way to critique this novel is through a psychoanalytic perspective, viewing the author, his characters, and their actions as a therapist would their patients. Of course, psychoanalysis is so broad that there are multiple different schools of thought even in this, most notable through Freudian, Jungian, and Lacanian perspectives.

Sigmund Freud, the father of modern psychoanalytic theory, not only built the foundation on which all psychotherapy now rests, but also constructed a model of the human psyche which can still be used today in interpreting novels. His theory was that the human mind has three separate parts: the id, ego, and superego. The id, roughly translated to ‘it’, is the unconscious, and is driven by the pleasure principle (i.e. instant gratification without conscious thought towards repercussions). The ego, or ‘I’, is what deals with conscious thought, actions, and memories in the brain, and the moderator of the brain. The superego, or ‘I above’, is the part of the brain that deals with morals and ideals taught to us by authority figures and society in general.   When a memory, feeling, urge is repressed, it is sent to the id, but still can manifest itself in the actions of a person without them being truly aware.

Carl Jung, Freud’s follower and later research partner, took Freud’s theories and basically expanded them. He theorized that not only do we have the id, ego, and superego, but also a collective unconscious, that which we are hardly aware of but manifests itself in widespread yet mostly insignificant societal phenomena. The collective unconscious is so subtle and ingrained that it is hardly noticeable, mainly appearing through archetypes, another one of Jung’s big theories. He was the pioneer of the concept of archetypes, the idea that all characterizations in literature had been done before, and modern fiction was just rehashing characters from ancient texts.

Jacques Lacan is the final major figure in psychoanalytic schools of thought. Parts of his work apply specifically to literature and linguistics, in particular his theories on symbolism and unconscious usage of certain words. He believed that when writing, an author would unintentionally use words that implied a subtle second meaning to a passage, and that those meanings could be linked back to the author’s id. However, for the most part his work focused on analyzing the body of the novel, and concentrated much less on how it related to the author than Jung and Freud before him.

Turn of the Screw can, of course, be viewed through the lens of all of these different schools of thought. Looking at it through a Jungian/Freudian perspective, it is entirely possible that the governess is in love with her employer, the mysterious Mr. Griffin. Unable to express this sexual desire, it manifests itself through her intense devotion (bordering on obsession) to the children and the protection of their innocence. In this theory, the ghosts are analogous to sexual corruption, and the reason why the children can’t see them is because they are too innocent to fear or be aware of this sort of corruption.  The governess, trained by society to be terrified of sexuality, sees them and feels the need to protect the children from the ghosts.

This is further backed up by the Lacanian notion that Turn of the Screw is subtly referencing medieval interrogation techniques: thumbscrews, for example, were common forms of torture, and throughout the text there are many, many times in which words like ‘pressure’, ‘press’, and ‘pinch’ are used when other, less meaning-heavy words could have been easily substituted. This could have several different implications based on the context in the novel: on page 23 during the prologue, this exchange happens: ‘…”If the child gives the effect another turn of the screw, what do you say to two children-?”
“We say of course,” somebody explained, “that two children give two turns!” ’, which could be implying that the pressure the governess feels taking care of two children is even more so than one, a responsibility she was not prepared for anyway. This excess of stress could have been the cause of a mental breakdown, leading to hallucinations (such as the ghosts). The subtle references to torture might also be indicative of Henry James’ feelings about the stigma thrust upon sexuality during the Victorian era, and his desire to see the stigma and resulting alienation thrust back upon those applying it, seen when the children turn upon their governess, in this case their interrogator.

Regardless of whether or not the unconscious usage of such words is an implication of a subconscious feeling of intense pressure to conform on H James’ part, it can certainly be agreed that the Turn of the Screw contains significant psychological implications in both its characters and the writing itself.

Psychoanalytic Literary Theory and It’s Perspectives on Henry James- Natasha

Psychoanalytic literary theory is the use of psychoanalysis to interpret literature. It’s particularly fascinating, and useful, when it comes to convoluted, complicated novels with plots open to interpretation and deep psychological drama. A fantastic example of this is Henry James’s Turn of The Screw. Born in 1843 and dying in 1916, James was a writer and literary critic, regarded as a key pillar of 19th century literary realism. He was also widely believed to be a closeted homosexual, which is relevant only in how it relates to the psychological interpretations of his work.

Henry James

Though women in the 1800’s were considered little more than human chattel, James managed to write a realistic female protagonist from the first person perspective in Turn of the Screw (TOTS).  Whether she was completely insane or not is another matter.  She was very realistic, and, also, possibly, quite insane. But before delving too deeply into the plot of TOTS, it might be useful to have a deeper understanding of psychoanalytic literary theory.

Sigmund Freud

Pioneered by Austrian Neurologist Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, psychoanalytic literary theory, while consisting of many disparate schools, primarily revolves around psychoanalyzing the author, characters, or text (language) of a book or other work of literature. To use psychoanalytic literary theory one must:

a. Read the text with a psychoanalytic perspective.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         b. Reread, looking for metonyms, metaphors, and Freudian slips (these are dead giveaways to a deeper emotion or meaning)                                                                                                                                     c. Narrow focus to the author, a main character, or the text itself.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     d. Consider possible manifestations of the unconscious.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          e. Interpret and write literary criticism of the work.

Freud was a big fan of repression, particularly sexual repression, and believed that one should read a book as if interpreting a dream, looking in metaphors and metonyms for the signs of sexual dysfunction hidden below the surface.

His colleague and spiritual heir, Carl Jung, expounded upon this idea by adding the theories of archetypes, or tropes that reoccur over and over, and the collective unconscious, a vast unconscious wellspring that we all draw from and that influences our conscious choices.

After Freud and Jung came Lacan, the French psychoanalyst who advocated a revival of Freud’s focus on the childhood, and pioneered the analysis of language itself in psychoanalytic literary theory, as well as the popular theory of the “mirror stage”, when the child first, looking into the mirror, recognizes itself as separate from the mother and begins to develop an ego.

Jacques Lacan 

Each analyst developed a “school”, or sorts, of similar thinking colleagues, and after them there were many other important figures in the field, each with their own theories and complexes to contribute-Anna Freud, Melanie Klein, D.W. Winicott. It’s a mistake to think of psychoanalytic literary theory as one vast, connected method of critical interpretation; rather one must pick and choose among prominent figures to create an interpretation of a text that suits them best.

In this spirit I interpret TOTS, and must add a proviso: what I see in the novel may not be what others see, as the best thing about TOTS is that it is open to interpretation. Feel free to contribute conflicting theories or refutations in the comment section. All is welcome in the spirit of intellectual discussion. Also, a brief synopsis of TOTS may be needed.

Essentially, a governess is hired by an absent uncle to run his manor in the country and educate his beautiful and intelligent orphaned niece and nephew, both of whom appear increasingly sinister to the governess as time goes on. The governess begins to see ghosts, one of a man, former head of the house (appointed by the uncle), who was a rake and died drunk. The other ghost is of the former governess, who was pregnant by the rake and probably died in childbirth. The governess is convinced that the children can also see these apparitions, and attempts to get them to admit this. At the end of the novel, she confronts the nephew, and he screams out the name of the ghost, heart stopping in her arms. The ending, like the entire book, is slippery, open to interpretation, and incredibly inconclusive. Though the novel is fertile ground for academic pursuits, it left me stone cold and beyond frustrated. Furthermore, on a personal note, Henry James’s page long paragraphs and interminable adverbs ought to be abolished.

A depiction of the governess with the children in a rendition of TOTS.

My first, more classically Freudian interpretation, is as thus: The governess subconsciously invented the ghosts as a means of impressing her sexual object, the uncle, with her competency and heroism. Though she professed to be a “screen”, protection for the children, she needed them to acknowledge the ghosts in order to preserve her mental and s they and the uncle would be aware of her sacrifice, her martyring. When the children did not see the ghosts she chose to believe they were lying and had been “lost.” At the end, unable to preserve her fantasy, she smothered Miles (the nephew). Her account (she tells the story in the form of a letter) is a plea to the uncle, and the ultimate authority of the reader, for absolution.

The other theory is that the book is a larger metaphor for the abuse of sexual desire, particularly homosexuality, in Victorian society. This is particularly poignant as /James himself is widely believed to be a closeted homosexual. The governess, representing wider society and Jung’s collective unconscious, is terrified by the children;s growing sexual maturity and her own displaced sexual desire for them. The ghosts are a manifestation of this fear, particularly the fear that Peter Quint (the male ghost) may have molested Miles, and his subsequent acting out at school was the result of this and the reason he was expelled. The children themselves don’t see the ghost because they are unafraid of sexuality and their own incumbent adulthood.

Psychoanalytic literary interpretation, while viewed by some as nothing but an intellectual excercise, and others as a perversion of the simple joy of reading a book for its own sake and taking it at face value, can have useful and lasting benefits. It can lead to insights, revelations, and a deeper interpretation of the text. When one understands the author and their motives, they can better understand the book. It can be fun, a diversion. And it can lead to meaningful contributions in both psychoanalysis and the wider field of literary theory. To that end, I applaud Freud for creating such an interesting new branch of intellectual discourse.

Freud says no problem.

What’s Up With Poe? Love Loss, and Frustrating Pyrrhic Feet: An Analysis of “A Dream Within A Dream” (Natasha)

Edgar Allan Poe was a deeply disturbed man. Abandoned by his father and orphaned by his mother at an early age, the young Poe was adopted by his godparents, John and Frances Allan. He struggled with a lifelong addiction to alcohol, and was discharged or left almost every school or institution he entered. The catalyst for Poe’s writing was when he was expelled from West Point; his adoptive father refused to give him any more money that would be spent on gambling or drink, and Poe turned to writing to support himself. At 26, he married his 13 year old cousin, Virginia Clemm, who passed two years before his own death. Throughout his life, Poe enjoyed brief periods of contentment and productivity truncated by addiction and familial loss. After he published his magnum opus, The Raven, he became internationally successful for nearly a decade before succumbing to alcohol and dying at the age of 40, found in a Baltimore gutter.

Edgar Allan Poe

 

His writing, particularly his poems, follow similar motifs, love, loss, the Gothic, and the darkly romantic. But one poem manages to transcend these norms while at the same time embracing them: A Dream Within A Dream.

A Dream Within A Dream

Take this kiss upon the brow!
And, in parting from you now,
Thus much let me avow-
You are not wrong, who deem
That my days have been a dream;
Yet if hope has flown away
In a night, or in a day,
In a vision, or in none,
Is it therefore the less gone?
All that we see or seem
Is but a dream within a dream.

I stand amid the roar
Of a surf-tormented shore,
And I hold within my hand
Grains of the golden sand-
How few! yet how they creep
Through my fingers to the deep,
While I weep- while I weep!
O God! can I not grasp
Them with a tighter clasp?
O God! can I not save
One from the pitiless wave?
Is all that we see or seem
But a dream within a dream?

Though the two stanzas a first seem dissimilar, they join together to form a lasting portrait of the impossibility of immortality and the pain of holding onto something not yours to keep. The poem begins with a person standing, desolate and mourning, on a “surf-tormented shore”, (in the absence of any other clues, we assume it is Poe), bemoaning the loss of a lover. He writes, “You are not wrong, who deem/That my days have been a dream;”) That is, he’s accepting that what he had with the woman could never last, and that it is nothing but a dream to think it could. But, this doesn’t matter to him. “If [the love] has flown away….in a vision, or in none/is it therefore the less gone?” To Poe, it doesn’t matter if his love was real or not, doesn’t matter that it wasn’t pearmanent and could never be so. What matters is that he loved her and now he is in pain because what he loved is gone. He ends the stanza with a statement: “All that we see or seem/ is but a dream within a dream.”

Poe‘s “surf-tormented shore”.

The second stanza encompasses and expands the first, broadening the focus from one brooding, grieving man (or woman), to all of humanity as we know it. The man holds “Grains of the golden sand,” falling through his fingers. The sand represents time, slipping away even as he tries desperately to hold on to it. The man is reduced to helplessness, pathetic, weeping, pleading to God to save just one grain from the “pitiless wave”. But he is not answered, and the man knows that, despite all his hubris, he is unable to extend his life and, like everyone before him, must simply wait in the dark for his candle to gutter out.

The stanza ends with a question. “Is all that we see or seem/ But a dream within a dream?” The answer to this question is yes. The smaller dream is us, our loves and hates and desire, our happiness and misery and small moments of divinity that we clutch onto like precious stones for as long as we can remember them. The smaller dream is his lover, who he cannot have and never really had in the first place. Our dreams are everything that we experience.

And then the larger dream is life itself. What’s death but the “Big sleep?” the “long rest?” When someone is dead, they’re “sleeping with the fishes.” What is death but a very long nap, and life but the briefest inconsequential flicker of a dream in the middle of it? We strut and fret our hour upon the stage, and no matter the quality of our performance, we all eventually bow out. Poe realized this, and that is what A Dream Within A Dream is about; loving something so much that you cling to every moment of it, even as you know it will eventually be taken away from you.

Between Sanity and Madness

Edgar Allan Poe is the archetypal tormented artist, a total embodiment of the half-mad genius, and this trait manifests itself in many of his works. A significant portion of the characters from whose perspective he writes occupy the liminal space between utter madness and sharp, typically devastating clarity.

One of the foremost examples of a perspective situated at the threshold of insanity is in his poem “The Raven’. The narrator appears in denial of a loss (of Lenore, who is referred to in other works and perhaps a representation of all the loss and mourning Poe has dealt with throughout his lifetime), though is taken in interest by a raven who perches on the bust of Pallas Athene, the Greek goddess of wisdom. When asked a semi-rhetorical question, the raven actually replies, and so begins the process of the narrator attempting to seek assurance in the bird’s answers to various questions, but only receiving “Nevermore”.Image

How is this insanity? Let’s first explore the potential for a distorted reality, one which the narrator conjures as an outlet for that which he will not consciously admit to himself. It’s entirely possible that the raven’s voice was an illusion, perhaps even going so far as to say that the raven may be a hallucination. That explanation would shed light on why exactly Poe consistently asked the raven questions which he knew would be answered with ‘nevermore’, although the nature of the questions hinted that he hoped for validation, i.e. Is there–is there balm in Gilead?–tell me–tell me I implore!”
Quoth the raven, “Well of course, friend! Don’t worry, Lenore will be back. Take my word for it. I’m a talking bird!”

In this way, it is entirely feasible that Poe was merely using the raven as a way to overcome his apparent and powerful denial of the inescapable nature of mortality and permanence of death.

In yet another one of his writings, The Black Cat, the idea of mental illness coexisting with rationality is dealt with very heavily. It begins with the narrator, nameless as in the Raven, explaining that he is totally sane (always a good sign, people), yet his mistreatment of a former pet has caused a reactionary chain of events that ended with him in the gallows.Image

In truth, every individual event that happens can readily be explained by his declining mental state, starting with alcoholism that causes him to become irrational and violent. This leads to him cutting out the eye of and hanging his cat, which drives him further to drink out of guilt. Later, when his house burns down, he swears that he can see an imprint of the black cat on a cubby hole. After losing everything, he and his still devoted wife are living in a cellar when he comes across another cat, similar in every way to the previous one except that it has a white patch in the middle of its chest.  Although he enjoys the cat’s presence at first, he slowly grows to hate it, as the white patch in the middle begins to appear to him as gallows. One night in an intoxicated state he attempts to murder the cat with an axe, but instead kills his wife. He hides the body in a wall and nearly avoids suspicion on the part of the police, yet is thwarted when he knocks on the wall to prove how solid it is. When plastering up his wife, he accidentally buried the cat in the wall, too, and its wails draw the attention of the chief of police.

Still, although the complete lack of guilt he feels after murder hints at a sociopathic disposition, when writing the account the day before the execution, he is able to rationalize all his actions and acknowledge that what he did was not just amoral, but fundamentally wrong and that he should feel remorse. Another interesting idea is that the white patch on the cat’s front could have never appeared as gallows, but merely acted as a pseudo-Rorschach test in taking that shape due to an innate sense of dread or foreboding possessed by the narrator. In this way, he wanders the gray area between sanity and madness, presenting evidence for both.

In conclusion, one of the many themes that remain consistent throughout Poe’s work is his characters’ tendencies to border madness, perhaps echoing what the haunted master himself was feeling. Throughout his life, Edgar Allan Poe suffered from alcoholism and the accompanying lack of control, as well as extreme grief and trauma throughout his early life. It is entirely possible that these experiences are what caused him to write his characters with the point of view of one half deranged or on the threshold of being disillusioned, as he had surely been many times during his tragically abbreviated life

Freyja